Just another WordPress.com weblog

The most important question in any investigation is…

WHO BENEFITS?

I watched a footage of the alleged attack on Prince Charles’s car this morning, and one thing was clear…the language was so foul and the English pronunciation from the alleged attackers so uncouth that one would reasonably conclude that those people were not University students.

The question then has to be this; why was the Prince’s car driven through a student protest zone?

The morning of Thursday the 8th started very uncomfortably for motorists as most major roads towards the House of Parliament  were closed.  Police helicopters patrolled the skies and helped organised the protest routes and how best to confine the student protests.

With the controversial Kettle technique employed by British police which confines protesters within tight fences with little room to manoeuvre and heavily armoured police officers with batons on the ready outside those fences, it sounds implausible that these students could have escaped, located the Prince’s route, and specifically targeted his car shouting…

…”Off with their heads”

This was clearly staged to crab the headlines and cover-up the worst government crime in history… i.e.  making University education unaffordable for the vast majority of British children.

One might as well move over to Scotland were University studies are free, or to Wales where the tuition fee rise will not be implemented.

Who benefited from the attack on the Prince’s Car?

The government…and they had every reason on earth to stage such a horrendous and despicable act to discredit the students.

Let me know what you think.

Image

Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison

by Jonathan Azaziah

 

Disinformation is defined as ‘misinformation that is deliberately disseminated in order to influence or confuse rivals.’ It is used by governments to mislead and brainwash their citizen populations, instigate wars, and blackmail foreign regimes. It is the ultimate instrument of the media. The most effective disinformation is that which is comprised of falsehood as well as facts. Wikileaks, founded by Julian Assange, fits this description perfectly, right down to the letter. Seemingly overnight, it has become one of the biggest ‘whistle-blowing’ agencies in modern history. In reality though, it is one of the biggest disinformation projects in modern history, and it may be the most dangerous because it is masquerading as an organization of truth. The information released by Wikileaks isn’t new; it isn’t groundbreaking; it doesn’t hurt the US as much as people think, it’s fractional really; and it is overloaded with as much as propaganda as the day-to-day Zionist media is. This propaganda is benefitting someone. And that someone is the illegal usurping entity of Israel. Even the Israeli government itself thinks so (1).

Afghanistan Drivel

The first major ‘leak’ released earlier this year by Assange was about occupied Afghanistan in the form of more than 92,000 documents. These docs included ‘secret files’ about civilian killings by the US and NATO along with boogeyman stories about the long-dead Osama Bin Laden, garbage regarding the Taliban acquiring ground-to-air missiles, and plenty of lies about Pakistan’s intelligence agency, the ISI (2). There wasn’t a single document about the Israeli training of the Taliban (3), the massive drug profiteering by the Mossad (4), the CIA (5) and the US-puppet Hamid Karzai and his brother (6), Karzai’s connections to Unocal and Zionist war criminal Henry Kissinger (7), the clandestine Israeli business operations set up to take control of the oil fields in neighboring Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan (8), or the Russian-Jewish mafia, fully protected by the Zionist entity, selling guns to US-backed Afghan warlords (9). Why weren’t any of these massively important, critically damning events and operations mentioned? Because by doing so, it would incriminate the already internationally condemned Zionist regime. Journalists, bloggers and activists, from occupied Afghanistan and abroad, have been reporting on the vast civilian casualties in Afghanistan since US intervention began more than 30 years ago. Wikileaks revealed nothing that wasn’t already known; however, it did reinforce Zionist propaganda regarding the illegal ‘war on terror.’

Iraq Malarkey

The next major ‘leak’ by Assange’s organization, which has gained more notoriety than the previous ‘leak,’ was about occupied Iraq in the form of nearly 400,000 documents. Like the occupied Afghanistan disinformation, it included ‘secret files’ about mass civilian killings by US forces, torture by war criminal Nouri al-Maliki and his forces (which according to Wikileaks, US military officials attempted to halt) (10), US government failings in reprimanding Blackwater (XE) for committing murder (11), and brutal executions by the American and British occupiers mixed with more tripe about fictitious Al-Qaeda, nonsense about Iran training militant Iraqi militias and Iranian drones flying over Iraq (12), Iran smuggling guns, munitions, and explosives into Iraq (13), ridiculous accusations of the Lebanese Resistance movement Hezbollah training Iraqis in the art of kidnaping (14), slanderous attacks on Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, and other absurd assertions about the Islamic Republic involved in the murder of innocent Iraqis. The Wikileaks Iraq war logs also ‘reveal’ civilian casualties numbered at 66,081 (15). The logs also ‘reveal’ that Iraqi WMDs actually did exist, as US soldiers found chemical weapons labs, terrorist toxin specialists, and chemical weapons caches (16).

There was nothing ‘secret’ about American and British forces murdering, torturing and raping innocents in occupied Iraq. Like Afghanistan, Iraqi and international journalists, bloggers, and activists have been reporting the murder of civilians in Iraq since the beginning of the illegal occupation, with much more effectiveness than Wikileaks. The US military didn’t attempt to halt the puppet al-Maliki’s torture of unlawfully imprisoned Iraqis, they partook in it. They led the way after they signed off on it. They were the primary perpetrators (17). Secret prisons are still operating at this very moment where US forces barbarously torture innocent Iraqis (18). The US hired Blackwater’s contractors to instill fear and execute terrorism against the people of Iraq, of course it didn’t reprimand them. Erik Prince’s private army of terror was only doing what it was told to by the US government.

The concept of Hezbollah training foreign militias to meddle in state affairs is absolute lunacy; Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah himself has stated on numerous occasions that if Hezbollah wanted to overthrow the Lebanese government, they would’ve done so already (19). Their objectives (as evidenced by their actions), are to protect the Lebanese people, provide them with security and uphold their dignity. Hezbollah hasn’t undermined its own government, it is asinine to think it would undermine the government of another nation. The propaganda targeting Iran is pathetic; there are enough guns in Iraq thanks to American support of Saddam Hussein to last lifetimes (20), there was no need for Iran to provide weapons to Iraqi militias through ‘smuggling.’ The only drones that were flying in Iraq’s skies belonged to the repulsive Zionist entity, not Iran (21). The other accusations sound like concoctions dug up from the dungeons of Zionist think tanks and lobby organizations salivating for the destruction of the Islamic Republic, not the work of whistle-blowers attempting to expose corruption and disseminate truth. These accusations further the Zionist case for striking Iran militarily. These accusations are promoting more war, not peace.

Wikileaks must not have gotten the memo about civilian casualties in occupied Iraq. They are nowhere near 66,081. They have eclipsed the 1.5 million mark. Anything less than this, especially a number as low as the one presented by Wikileaks, is classic misreporting aimed at protecting the United States government and its collaborators. That is an insult to the 5 million Iraqi orphans and the 5 million Iraqi refugees. It is a slap in the face to the dead Iraqis whose names will never be known because they were incinerated by US and Israeli weaponry. And the notion that US soldiers found WMDs in Iraq, after the ‘Iraq has WMDs’ myth has been debunked as Zionist-designed propaganda over and over again, is frankly, infuriating. The only WMDs that exist in Iraq are the mark-77, white phosphorus, and thousands of tons of depleted uranium used in Basra, Baghdad, and Fallujah by the terrorist army of the US and strategically placed Mossad agents of Israel (22).

Targeted On Behalf Of Israel

Where are the leaks on the 55 Zionist companies profiting from Iraqi blood being spilled (23)? Where are the leaks on Iraq’s artifacts being stolen by Zionist agents (24)? Where are the leaks on hundreds of Mossad agents operating in Mosul (25)? Where are the leaks on the Mossad bomb-making facility in Kirkuk (26)? Where are the leaks on the Mossad murderers stationed in several villages around the devastated area of Fallujah (27)? Where are the leaks on the depleted-uranium-tipped IEDs of Zionist-owned Zapata Engineering that have massacred thousands in Najaf, Karbala and Tal Afar, just to name a few (28)? Where are the leaks on the Israeli arms dealers supplying weapons to CIA-trained death squads (29)? Where are the leaks on Zionist war criminal Paul Wolfowitz importing Shin Bet torture experts to train the US military (30)? Where are the leaks on Mossad conducting interrogations and torture in Iraq jails, including Abu Ghraib (31)? Where are the leaks that will actually tie the illegal war, which was exclusively designed by Zionists, to Israel? They don’t exist because Wikileaks isn’t concerned with uncovering the truth regarding the real criminals; they’re concerned with leading the public away from the truth to keep them under control. It’s COINTELPRO all over again.

The target of Wikileaks’ first release was the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The objectives of the operation were to give credibility to war criminal Obama’s illegal drone strikes that have murdered over 1,000 civilians (32), raise the possibility of a future overt occupation, and cover up the meddling of Israel in occupied Afghanistan. It is vital to note that the de-stablization of Pakistan has been a Zionist objective since the declaration of al-Nakbah architect, David Ben-Gurion (33). The target of Wikileaks’ second release was the Islamic Republic of Iran. The objective of this operation was to slander two of the very few entities on earth resisting Israel, Hezbollah and Iran; as well as cover up the Zionist fingerprints all over the mutilation of Iraq. The IAEA has already inadvertently foiled the Zionist plan to attack Iran based on the nuclear premise, confirming that the Iranian nuclear program is peaceful in nature and has nothing to do with weaponization (34). The Zionist hasbara experts needed to try something new; through Wikileaks, the accusations of the Zionist Bush administration against Iran have resurfaced under the guise of ‘whistle-blowing.’ What a sham.

Conclusion

A final note needs to be made about Julian Assange, the man who has been praised as a freedom fighter, a revolutionary and a friend of the oppressed people. In a recent interview, he stated, “I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud (35).” It’s shameful that Assange is annoyed by those seeking truth regarding the reason 1.5 million innocents are dead in occupied Iraq, 1.2 million innocents are dead in occupied Afghanistan, and thousands of more innocent men, women and children are dead in occupied Palestine, Lebanon, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. 9/11 is anything but a false conspiracy; there is overwhelming evidence that American and Israeli officials didn’t just have foreknowledge of the event, but planned the attack and carried it out. It was a Mossad-CIA false flag used to protect the Zionist entity from any future military threat and expand the parasitic hegemony of the US and the illegitimate Tel Aviv regime throughout the world via the Zionist-inspired ‘war on terror (36).’ Someone insulting the seekers of 9/11 truth, slandering the righteous movement of Hezbollah, spreading propaganda about Iran which adds to the demonization campaign levied against the Islamic Republic by the Zionist lobby and the Zionist media, and deliberately leaving out Israeli crimes in occupied Afghanistan and Iraq is no freedom fighter; such a person is a liar and a propagandist.

Wikileaks’ most recent ‘leak’ about occupied Iraq was delivered to several mainstream news outlets including Al-Jazeerah, the Zionist New York Times, Der Spiegel of Germany, which has smeared Hezbollah in the past by despicably accusing the Resistance of selling narcotics (37), Zionist-controlled Le Monde of France which has also smeared Hezbollah recently (38) and The Guardian of the UK, in packages, as if it was some sort of gift for a holiday. This isn’t a leak. This isn’t an expose. This is a press release. This is a media spectacle. This is a circus to cover up real crimes. Those interested in seeing a real leak, in addition to real courage, should read the story of Mordechai Vanunu, who blew the whistle on Israel’s nuclear program and has spent the last 26 years in and out of Israel’s inhumane prisons, including 18 years consecutively with 11 of those years in solitary confinement (39).

Iraq was annihilated for the Zionist regime, as was Afghanistan. When discussing the destruction of these nations, and the murder of millions of their people, it is integral to the understanding of the crimes committed to discuss the Israeli role in these crimes. Any person or institution failing to do so is ignorant, a coward or a collaborationist. None of these persons have any place in the movement to restore the occupied lands to the indigenous people and bring their tormentors to justice. By supporting Wikileaks, you are not fighting the occupier. You are not honoring the martyrs. You are not combating imperialism. And you are not striking back at the oppressor. You are supporting Israel and the cover-up of the activities of its criminal network. Wikileaks is Zionist poison. Wake up.

~ The End ~

Sources:

(1) Wikileaks Reports Could Halt Iran’s Nuclear Drive by Yaakov Katz, Jerusalem Post

(2) Wikileaks, Afghanistan and Pakistan by Muhammad Abdullah Gul

(3) Framing Pakistan: How The Pro-Israel Media Enables India’s Surrogate Warfare by Maidhc O Cathhail

(4) Intel Expert Says 9/11 Looks Like A Hollywood Show by Christopher Bollyn

(5) The Spoils Of War: Afghanistan’s Multibillion Dollar Heroin Trade by Michel Chossudovsky

(6) Wikileaks Is Israel, Like We All Didn’t Know by Gordon Duff, Veterans Today

(7) Profile: Unocal by History Commons

(8) The Great Game: The War For Caspian Oil And Gas by Christopher Bollyn

(9) Drugs For Guns: How The Afghan Heroin Trade Is Fueling The Taliban Insurgency by Jerome Starkey, The Independent; Red Mafiya: How The Russian Mob Has Invaded America by Robert Friedman (rip)

(10) Iraq War Documents Shed Light On Civilian Deaths, Prisoner Abuse by David Wood

(11) Iraq War Logs: Private Militarization Run Amok by Pratap Chatterjee, The Guardian

(12) US Shot Down Iranian Drone In Iraq, Wikileaks Confirms by Adam Weinstein

(13) Iraq War Logs Detail Iran’s Aid For Militias by Michael R. Gordon and Andrew W. Lehren, The New York Times

(14) Wikileaks Tip Iran’s Hand In Iraq by Samuel Segev, Winnipeg Free Press

(15) Iraq War Leaks: No US Investigation Of Many Abuses by Al-Masry Al-Youm

(16) Wikileaks Show WMD Hunt Continued In Iraq – With Surprising Results by Noah Shachtman

(17) Iraq Today: Afflicted By Violence, Devastation, Corruption And Desperation by Stephen Lendman

(18) Lawless Arrests, Detentions And Torture In Iraq by Stephen Lendman

(19) Sayyed Nasrallah: Bellemare, UN Protecting False Witnesses by Al-Manar

(20) Ho Hum, More Wikileaks Chickenfeed by Gordon Duff, Veterans Today

(21) Israeli Drones Said Operating Over Iraq And Afghanistan by Yossi Melman, Haaretz

(22) The Zionist Murderers Of Iraq by Jonathan Azaziah

(23) 55 Zionist Companies Working In Iraq Under Assumed Names by Yaqen News Agency, translated by Muhammad Abu Nasr

(24) Israel Hopes To Colonize Parts of Iraq as ‘Greater Israel’ by Wayne Madsen

(25) Facts Vs. Beliefs –Today’s Ancient Warfare by Jeff Gates

(26) Resistance Kills Mossad Agents In Iraq by The Egyptian Gazette

(27) Israel’s Battle In Fallujah by Rashid Khashana, Al-Hayat

(28) Iraq IEDs: Mossad/Zapata Engineering Conspiracy? by Cloak and Dagger; Israeli Made IEDs and US Zapata Engineering made IED Triggers Are Killing US, Canadian And NATO Soldiers by NB Gazette

(29) Israeli Officer Sells Weapons To Terrorists In Iraq by Press TV; CIA Death Squads Operating In Iraq by Henry Michaels

(30) Seymour Hersh And The Missing Zionist-Israeli Connection by James Petras

(31) Mossad Does Interrogations in Iraqi Jails: Human Rights Group by China Radio International English; What Were Mossad Agents With Fraudulent New Zealand Passports Doing In Iraq? by Jerry Mazza

(32) US Drone Strikes Kill 18 In Pakistan by Press TV

(33) Mossad And India Spy Agency Team Up, Target Pakistan by Tariq Saeedi

(34) IAEA Report: Zero Evidence Of Iran Nukes. US Orwellian Corporate Media: Iran Building Nukes? by Carl Herman, The Los Angeles Examiner

(35) Wanted By The CIA: The Man Who Keeps No Secrets by Matthew Bell, The Independent

(36) 9/11: Israel’s Grand Deception by Jonathan Azaziah

(37) Hezbollah Denies Der Spiegel’s ‘Cheap Fabrications’ by Al-Manar

(38) Le Monde: A Group Affiliated With Hezbollah Takes Photos Of The Hague by NOW Lebanon

(39) The Woman From Mossad: The Story Of Mordechai Vanunu And The Israeli Nuclear Program by Peter Hounam.

To understand a man, look at his doctrine.

gaddafi3During his term as  Chairman of the African Union, Gaddafi said he will try and expedite the creation of a single African Government initially through the scrapping of visas so as to facilitate free movement of people and goods, and through the establishment of a single currency for the continent.

This was to be followed by the creation of a continental Trade Ministry, Finance Ministry and Defence/Security Ministry. That vision was based on the assumption that he would be the leader of the African continent. Gaddafi’s popularity soared at the beginning of his term as Chairman. He was regarded as a great man primarily for his defiance towards American imperialism. On his tour of African nations, the streets were swamped by the young and old, all trying to catch a glimpse of the ‘great man’ and his female bodyguards.

Before flying to the headquarters of the African Union in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, for the organisation’s 10th ordinary session, Libya’s ‘great leader’ unloaded jabs at African leaders for what he pointed out as their sluggish approach towards a union government. He even threatened to take his attention and investment away from Africa and direct it to the Arab world and Mediterranean areas. His proposal on the United States of Africa faced serious challenge in the last AU summit in Ghana where it was decided that the issue be considered first by a working group. The report of the committee is expected to be discussed in Addis Ababa. His public threat and denouncement comes as a last-ditch attempt to influence this deliberation.

Gaddafi’s eccentricities from the AU high table are often predictable and easy to understand. Ever since he captured power in the 1969 revolution, Mr. Gaddafi has tipped toed countless contradictions. Traversing a complex jigsaw of ‘isms’, Libya’s long serving leader keeps on writing a messy script on leadership and diplomacy. During his revolutionary periods, Gaddafi’s inspiration was not drawn from the panafricanism of Nkrumha but from the Arab nationalism of Gamal Abdel Nasser. In 1972, he set out to establish the Federation of Arab Republic. His new-found zeal for pan-Africanism emerged during his isolationism by the West during which he deftly developed his connection with Africa as a secure arena of recognition and influence. African Union’s meetings proffered platforms where he felt great, acceptable and sometimes mainstream.

But his thinking on a swift creation of union government is unrealistic. Few countries in African even conduct proper trade among themselves. There are still divergent political visions and orientations among the 53 states. Against all the denials, the linguistic split between the Anglophone and Francophone is still significant. Moreover, the manner in which Gaddafi delivers his message has been notably divisive. Gaddafi and his envoys are apathetic to the way the union is organised. Neither are they interested in reasoned debate and discussions. They rather chose to buy support from weak and small African countries. Numerous countries such as Guinea, Togo, Borkinafaso, Mali etc have benefited from Gaddafi’s financial largess. Prior to the Addis Ababa submit, Gaddafi hosted a congregation of African government to draw them to his program.

The thousands of young boys from Conakry to Freetown who flock to see him during some of his now common visits do so not for his uplifting pan-Africanist vision or mission but by a sheer bewilderment of a filthy rich Arab leader who often literally litters them with payouts while passing gaddafi2through their streets with his camel entourage and women bodyguards. Unlike the countries of the first generation of pan-Africanist leaders, Libya is not a great host for African countries. Even while Gaddafi is engaged in the high talk about Africa, thousands of Africans are forcefully expelled from Libya. Many fear that, if Gaddafi is allowed to have his way with his outlandish views, the Union’s credibility will be seriously impugned.

Despite spending huge sums of money buying votes Gaddafi failed in his bid to stay on as president of the African Union for a second year. While handing over power to Malawi president Bingu wa Mutharika, an acrimonious Gaddafi later said, after all, it was an empty chair with mere symbolic powers since many declarations and decisions were made without his consent.

Reports indicated that he struggled hard to retain the rotating chair, which dragged a preliminary Saturday meeting into the late hours of the night.

The Libyan leader also used his farewell speech to accuse the African Union of wasting time while failing to meet global challenges.

He again urged the African leaders to begin the process of political unification, which was a large part of his agenda.

"It was like we were building a new atomic bomb or something," he said, referring to meetings that had lasted long into the night and that he characterised as "really useless".

"The world’s engine is turning into seven or ten countries and we are not aware of that," Gaddafi said, dressed in a white robe and black fur hat.

"The EU is becoming one country and we are not aware of it. We have to get united to be united. Let’s be united today."

Gaddafi, supported by leaders like Senegal’s Abdoulaye Wade, has been pushing for an African unity government for years, saying it is the only way Africa can develop without Western interference.

But members, led by South Africa and Ethiopia, argue the plan is impractical and would infringe on sovereignty.

After the opening speeches, there were murmurs of confusion when Gaddafi invited representatives of African kings and traditional leaders to speak.

They were not on the agenda and they surprised both security and heads of state as they walked in behind Gaddafi with their flowing robes, animal skins and staffs embroidered in gold.

No sitting provisions had been made for them by the organisers, which prompted them to hijack seats marked "First Ladies".

The leader of the delegation, Tchiffi Zif Gervais from Ivory Coast, told the heads of state that the forum of kings, sultans and traditional leaders that was established by their leader and "king of kings" Gaddafi was to unite and serve the African people.

"It is a privilege for you to have us here. I would like to thank the President of Uganda, Yoweri Museveni, who met us and is now our honorary member. He has also agreed to write a dictionary in his local language and to help African traditional leaders."

He said their role was not to engage in politics. "Ours is not a political tool. Our role is to give support and stability, a tool for social cohesion that has already mediated in some conflicts on the continent like Guinea."

He blamed the leaders for Africa’s poverty that has persisted half a century after independence, saying there is need to forge a united front with traditional leaders to address the imbalance of trade.

"Africa must develop on the basis of its own culture. Some heads of state had not understood what our role was but our king of kings took the decision and arranged for us to meet some leaders," he said.

Gaddafi stressed that there was no conflict between the role of traditional leaders and politicians, saying even Museveni has understood that after he met them.

So, an egotistical man who fancies himself as president for life is unceremoniously dumped. Talk about Hope and Change! He is the one we’ve been waiting for. Having created many enemies and with time running out (age), Gaddafi badly needed a new plan to be “KING”. This gave birth to talks of a Mediterranean Union.

EU countries such as Italy, Spain and France have been actively grooming Libya to be a buffer zone against Africa’s illegal immigration. Thus Gaddafi’s new vision of ‘great Mediterranean union’, for all that is worth, is a buzz concept created in France’s Minstere des Affaires etrageres not in Sirte. For sometime to come, however, we have to get used to ‘the great leader’ who enjoys seeing African leaders in the opposite side of the isle.

Since his eviction from the AU seat, Gaddafi has gone on a verbal assault of Africa/Africans (Assuming he is an Arab that is). The following are excerpts from his speech in Italy in a bid to get €5billion from EU countries to fight illegal migration from Africa through Libya. The once King of Kings of Africa had this to say….

 

August 31 2010

Europe…"tomorrow, with the advance of millions of immigrants, could become (another) Africa,"

Libya "is the entry door for unwanted immigration" which should be "stopped at the Libyan borders," he went on.

"Tomorrow Europe might no longer be European and even black as there are millions (of Africans) who want to come in," Gaddafi argued, describing the migratory movements as "something very dangerous".

gaddafi1quote We don’t know what will happen, what will be the reaction of the white and Christian Europeans faced with this influx of starving and ignorant Africans quote 

"We don’t know if Europe will remain an advanced and united continent or if it will be destroyed as happened with the barbarian invasions."

“There is also desirable immigration. There are Libyans who have money and I encourage them to come to Italy to invest."

Gaddafi had said at a gathering of about 500 girls who were paid to about $100 each to attend that "women are more respected in Libya than in the West" and offered assistance in finding Libyan husbands.

What are we to make of Muammar al-Gaddafi?

 

Ah! If you are here, then you must have crawled the web in search of a solution for this nagging problem. Let me guess, you disabled the annoying auto-archive function but now that you want it you can’t find it in the menu option.

Rejoice for the solution is here. Make a cup of coffee and follow the instructions below.

To restore the Auto Archive button on Outlook, follow the steps below: 

 

  1. Start–> Run –> type in “regedit” without  the “
  2. Go to:

    HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\11.0\Outlook

  3. Left click on Outlook folder to reveal a list of files on the right-hand window.
  4. Look for the file with name DisablePST
  5. Right click on DisablePST
  6. Choose modify
  7. Change in the value data from 1 to 0
  8. Restart Outlook program
  9. AutoArchive is restored!

Please make a donation so we can develop a FREE searchable database with solutions for annoying pc problems.

                      paypal